Updated, 3.2.12, 8:45 a.m.
According to theeagle.com, the TAMU Student Election Commission miscalculated the voting results and Ms. Ketcham will not be in a run-off.
Updated, 2.29.12, 2:53 p.m.
According to the The Eagle, the Bryan/College Station daily newspaper, Samantha Ketcham did well enough in Tuesday's Yell Leader elections to move on to a run-off election to be held on Thursday and Friday. (The newspaper also points out that only one of the five senior candidates - the other female running for the position - did not make the run-off election.) The other three candidates headed to the run-off election all received more than twice as many votes as Ms. Ketcham. The opposition to Ms. Ketcham as a Yell Leader was highlighted in The Eagle's article by a quote from a freshman student at TAMU. Said this student, "It's not that we're against women. You don't want women on our men's basketball teams, and you don't want men on our women's basketball teams. Being a Yell Leader is for men." Kind of makes me wish I had a vote to cast for Ketcham...
Yell Leader Elections made the front page of the Wall Street Journal. Why, you might ask? Because there are two women - one of whom has and continues to run an unprecedentedly visible campaign - vying for one of the five traditionally-male Yell Leader positions.
I have to believe that Samantha Ketcham, the female candidate and subject of the Wall Street Journal article, is backed by a fair number of supporters. She wouldn't have thrown her hat into this very controversial ring if she wasn't sure she wouldn't end up all alone with egg on her face on election day. And if what I came across online is any indication, many of those in favor of electing a female Yell Leader believe that the time to do so is now because TAMU is already in a state of transition, what with the impending move from the Big 12 to the SEC and the elimination of the annual A&M vs. Texas football showdown.
But my online research also highlighted for me the numerous and equally visible campaigns AGAINST Ms. Ketcham's (and the other female student running in the Yell Leader elections) candidacy, and these campaigns aren't necessarily in support of another candidate...they're just in opposition to her. It seems there are plenty of students, alumni, and community members who believe the long-standing tradition of an all-male Yell Leader squad should live on.
For me, the verdict's still out. I believe in equal opportunity, and if in 18 years Hallie wanted to run for Yell Leader I'd stand behind her 100%. But I'm also a lover of tradition, and I greatly admire TAMU for the work their Traditions Council does to preserve the traditions of this great university.
What do you think?